Differences in Sexual Behaviours One of Relationships Apps Profiles, Former Profiles and you can Non-pages
Descriptive analytics about sexual habits of total take to and you can the 3 subsamples out of energetic users, previous pages, and you will non-users
Becoming solitary decreases the quantity of unprotected complete sexual intercourses
In regard to the number of partners with whom participants had protected full sex during the last year, the ANOVA revealed a significant difference between user groups (F(dos, 1144) = , P 2 = , Cramer’s V = 0.15, P Figure 1 represents the theoretical model and the estimate coefficients. The model fit indices are the following: ? 2 = , df = 11, P 27 the fit indices of our model are not very satisfactory; however, the estimate coefficients of the model resulted statistically significant for several variables, highlighting interesting results and in line with the reference literature. In Table 4 , estimated regression weights are reported. The SEM output showed that being active or former user, compared to being non-user, has a positive statistically significant effect on the number of unprotected full sexual intercourses in the last 12 months. The same is for the age. All the other independent variables do not have a statistically significant impact.
Output out-of linear regression design entering market, dating apps use and you will objectives out of installations variables since the predictors for what amount of safe complete sexual intercourse’ people one of active users